Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Starr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1930No. 22166. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to certain real property, and in the alternative to foreclose a mortgage thereon. The defendants answered, and by cross-complaint sought to quiet title to the property in themselves. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court, concluded that the defendants had the superior title. Judgment was entered dismissing the plaintiffs’ action, quieting the title to the property in the defendants, and confirming their right to possession, from which judgment the plaintiffs appeal.

The material facts are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Worcester National Bank v. CheeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hitchcock v. NixonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Aiken v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Bassett v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mobley v. HarkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hilmes v. MoonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Altabet v. Monroe Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. New McDermott, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Gill v. StroufWashington Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API