Legal Opinion

Worcester National Bank v. Cheeney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Greene county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scholfield

This is a controversy between Prentiss D. Cheeney and The Worcester National Bank, of Worcester, Mass., in regard to a large steam flouring mill at Kane, Greene county. Cheeney’s claim rests upon a sheriff’s deed, made pursuant to sale on a special execution issued on a judgment in attachment in his favor, and against one George W. Howe. The claim of the bank rests, primarily, upon a trust deed in the nature of a mortgage, executed by Donald Carmichael to Marcus M. Johnson, to secure the payment of promissory notes for $15,000.

The purpose of Cheeney’s original and supplemental bills was to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. HockenhullIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Edgerton v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Manning v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Drumm Construction Co. v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Franklin Savings Bank v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
  4. Watts v. Eufaula National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Lowden v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API