Gill v. Strouf

Plaintiff brought suit to recover the unpaid balance due upon a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given as security therefor. Defendants Strouf answered and cross-complained, alleging payment of the note held by plaintiff and seeking, in turn, recovery upon certain notes held by them, as well as foreclosure of two mortgages given as security for the latter notes. All the mortgages here involved concern the same realty.

Trial to the court resulted in judgment for plaintiff in an amount found to be due upon the note held by him, together with an attorney’s fee, and for defendants…