Legal Opinion

Barker v. Advanced Silicon Materials, LLC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 14, 2006No. 23746-0-IIIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*619¶1

Sweeney, J.

— This appeal follows dismissal of claims of sexual discrimination (on summary judgment) and retaliatory discharge (following a bench trial). The question posed on the first claim is whether the employee has made a sufficient showing that the employer’s explanation for promoting a man for a position for which she also applied was pretextual. We conclude that her showing on that issue is conclusory and speculative and therefore affirm the summary dismissal of the claim. We also conclude that substantial evidence supports the trial judge’s finding of fact that retaliation was not a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Tacoma School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Fulton v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. American Express Centurion Bank v. StratmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Baddeley v. SeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Baddeley v. SeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API