Legal Opinion

American Continental Insurance v. Steen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. 73412-7PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

Pursuant to RCW 2.60.020 and RAP 16.16, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified to this court two questions concerning the annulment of liability insurance policies. Those questions ask:(1) Is the early cancellation of a claims-made policy that insures against loss or damage through legal liability for the bodily injury or death by accident of any individual an attempt at a prohibited retroactive “annulment” “after the occurrence of any such injury, death, or damage for which the insured may be liable” under RCW 48.18.320, where the cancellation does not affect…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. INDOOR BILLBOARD WASHINGTON, INC. v. Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Indoor Billboard/Washington, Inc. v. Integra Telecom of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API