Legal Opinion

Nevers v. Anderson

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 1, 1984No. File 408811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The plaintiffs in this case are residents and taxpayers of the city of New Britain. The defendants include the city of New Britain, the mayor, the city treasurer, and all of the aldermen of the city who have held office from November 10,1981, to the present time. The plaintiffs have brought this action (1) for an injunction restraining the city from making any payments of an “unrestricted expense account” to the defendant aldermen pursuant to an ordinance adopted on December 16,1981, (2) for an order declaring that ordinance illegal, unconstitutional and void, and (3) for an order requiring…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McGovern v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Ashton v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Loushay AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Geyso v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Nevers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Danielczuk v. Ansonia Brd., Apport. Txn., No. Cv98062818 (Jan. 12, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API