Legal Opinion
Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Glastonbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 1988No. 5505PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court granted the defendants’1 motion to strike. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in striking the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to allege facts sufficient to establish standing to challenge the disbursement of funds for the improvement of an unimproved road located in the town of Glastonbury.
The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant town of Glastonbury, in one count, seeking an injunction to prohibit the disbursement of funds for the improvement of an unimproved road within the town. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hall v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Belford v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Windham Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Wing v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Applied Computer Security P. v. Trumbull Eac, No. 325072 (Dec. 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Candlewood Hills Tax District v. MedinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Town of GlastonburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.