Legal Opinion

Gottstein v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1944No. Civ. 14429PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

In this action to quiet title, judgment was in favor of certain defendants on their cross-complaint and plaintiff: was held to have no right, title or interest in or to the real property in question, consisting of 80 feet of land in Seaside Park, Los Angeles County. Plaintiff appeals.

Defendants and respondents are the owners of the property, and the judgment should be affirmed if, as the trial court held, the tax deed under which plaintiff claims title is invalid. Plaintiff’s title depends not alone upon the validity of the proceedings leading up to and including the issuance of the tax deed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Redman v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Rancho Cucamonga v. MacKzumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Wall v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Griffith Co. v. BelchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. County of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. State ex rel. Cranston v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API