Legal Opinion

Webster v. Zevin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1947No. Civ. 15424PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for the death of her minor son, 18 years of age, as a result of being struck by an automobile.

The facts are not in controversy and may be thus epitomized; The automobile involved, a 1941 Hudson sedan, was owned by appellant Esther Zevin. Defendant Ralph F. Luria was a friend of appellant’s husband who is not involved in this appeal. Appellant’s husband usually drove and used his wife’s vehicle. Mr. Luria arranged with said husband on the evening of October 15, 1943, to borrow the Hudson automobile for his own convenience and not for any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Sylvester v. Brockway Motor Truck Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Schefke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Bohn v. Mayor & City Council of FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. DolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API