Baugh v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
The instant cause has been tried twice. At the conclusion of the first trial a judgment for defendants was rendered, but plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted. The order granting a new trial was sustained on appeal by the Supreme Court. (Baugh v. Rogers, 24 Cal.2d 200 [148 P.2d 633, 152 A.L.R. 1043].)
In the instant trial, the jury rendered a directed verdict in favor of defendant Rogers and brought in a verdict for the plaintiff and against defendant Warnock for the sum of $5,000, whereupon a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted in favor of defendant Warnock.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Webster v. ZevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Lenthall v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.