Legal Opinion

Baugh v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1947No. Civ. No. 15511PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

The instant cause has been tried twice. At the conclusion of the first trial a judgment for defendants was rendered, but plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was granted. The order granting a new trial was sustained on appeal by the Supreme Court. (Baugh v. Rogers, 24 Cal.2d 200 [148 P.2d 633, 152 A.L.R. 1043].)

In the instant trial, the jury rendered a directed verdict in favor of defendant Rogers and brought in a verdict for the plaintiff and against defendant Warnock for the sum of $5,000, whereupon a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted in favor of defendant Warnock.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Webster v. ZevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lenthall v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API