Ahlman v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an action to quiet title and to restrain the issuance of bonds upon plaintiff’s property for street work in the city of San Jose. Similar actions were brought against the defendants by four other property owners. By stipulation, the actions were consolidated and tried together.
The only pleadings in the record before us are the complaint .of the plaintiff, Ahlman, and an amendment thereto, and the answer of defendant, the Barber Asphalt Paving Company. Respondent, in his brief, states that said answer was adopted by the other defendants, and we will so consider it, although there is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Fritz v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Walnut Creek v. SilveiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Hollywood Cemetery Assn. v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Bonander v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Keller v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.