Legal Opinion

Black v. Port, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1963No. 4267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

A judgment in the amount of $22,000 was entered upon the verdict of the jury in a negligence action. Motion for new trial was overruled. Defendant-appellant’s assigned errors will be considered in order.

First assignment of error: Did the trial court err in refusing to withdraw a juror and continue the cause upon the motion of the defendant when the plaintiff’s counsel upon voir dire examination asked the following: “Do any of you have an application pending now for premise liability with an insurance company.” The court sustained the objection and instructed the jury to disregard the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Spitzer v. StillingsOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Dowd-Feder, Inc. v. TruesdellOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hanna v. StollOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Harpman v. Devine, Recr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ethel M. West v. Gary M. JutrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Alan J. Wicks v. Milton HenkenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Woyczynski v. WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Vincenzo v. NewhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Ethel M. West v. Gary M. JutrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API