Legal Opinion

Dowd-Feder, Inc. v. Truesdell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1936No. 24902PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Two questions are presented for our determination. First, whether it is error for a trial court to allow interrogation of prospective jurors on their voir dire concerning their possible connections with, interest in, or relationship to a casualty insurance company; and second, whether the facts as reflected by the record establish agency.

The first is the more important question presented for our consideration. "We are faced with the problem of granting plaintiff in a personal injury case reasonable safeguards against obtaining a jury .composed of men and women having insurance connections or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pavilonis v. ValentineOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. M. O'Connor & Co. v. GillaspyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API