Legal Opinion

Price v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, Appellant, Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corporation, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to grant its motions for post-trial relief, compulsory nonsuit, and directed verdict. We must determine whether appellant is estopped from denying the applicability of the warranty. We must also determine whether Appellant breached the warranty and whether Appellee provided sufficient evidence that the problems with the subject vehicle were not the result of abnormal use or secondary causes. Lastly, we must determine whether Appellee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Altronics of Bethlehem, Inc. Altronics of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Repco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Parker v. FreilichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commc'ns Network Int'l, Ltd. v. MullineauxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Mayberry v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API