People v. Clarke
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
A party generally must specify the basis for an objection to preserve a question of law for this Court’s review. In this case defense counsel made only a general objection to the court’s multiple rulings regarding the proposed testimony of a witness. Accordingly, defendant’s present contention that the testimony constituted hearsay and improperly bolstered another prosecution witness’ testimony has not been preserved for our review.
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and…
2Cited by26 opinions
- People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. MeskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. SanzottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.