Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Wright
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 1936No. 26038PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The plaintiff in this case filed an action seeking to recover certain funds. Plaintiff in error filed a petition asking that he be adjudged to be the owner thereof. From an adverse judgment, he appeals.
The judgment in this case was entered on the 12th day of May, 1934. The appeal is from the order overruling the motion for new trial entered May 29, 1934. The appeal was lodged in this court November 28, 1934. The appeal therefore can only be by case-made, duly served, settled, and signed. The case-made was duly served on the 26th day of September, 1934. Notice of settlement was waived November…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kilgore v. YarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- May v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Wyant v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Anadarko v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of Ed., City of Wilson v. Liberty Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946