Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax Assessor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 28, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) appeals from the entry of a final judgment in the Business and Consumer Docket (Nivison, J.) concluding that, as a matter of law, our holding in Linnehan Leasing v. State Tax Assessor, 2006 ME 33, 898 A.2d 408, applies retroactively. Sears argues that Maine recognizes the practice of retroactively applying certain legal holdings of a decision in a case to the parties in that case but only prospectively in all other instances.1 Sears urges us to adopt the three-part test enumerated in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07, 92 S.Ct. 349, 30 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Bakal v. WeareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Searle v. Town of BucksportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Child of Nicholas P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. Robin McDonald v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. The Bank of New York Mellon v. Danielle ShoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. Eric v. Warnquist v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  5. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API