Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of Taxes
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (lender) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (retailer) (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from a superior court decision 1 affirming the determination of the Vermont Department of Taxes (Department) that the parties, who had partnered to operate a private label credit card program through retailer’s stores, were not entitled to sales tax refunds related to bad debts. The Department denied lender’s refund requests because it is not a registered vendor under Vermont law that remitted the sales tax it seeks to recover, and denied retailer’s deductions because it did not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. New York State Division of Tax AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Williston Inn GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Puget Sound National Bank v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. John J. Stern, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Construction & Operation of a Meteorological TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Georges Way v. HarringtonVermont Superior Court · 2025
- State v. John J. Stern, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018