Legal Opinion
Voegele v. Mahoney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 1952No. 35,732PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for amended findings, conclusions of law, and order for judgment in their favor or for a new trial.
Many of the facts are not in dispute. Cornelius Mahoney, grandfather of defendants, died testate on April 28, 1926. Objections were filed to the allowance of his will, but after a contested hearing it was admitted to probate. Mary Long, a daughter, was named executrix, and Thomas H. Quinn, .an attorney at law practicing at Faribault, acted as her attorney. The contestants were represented by other counsel.
The estate of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Rupley v. FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Skala v. LindbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Bustad v. BustadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. v. Galaxy Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- D.M.S. v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.