Legal Opinion
Overfield v. Pennroad Corporation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 2, 1941No. 258PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
The complainant’s motion is to amend her bill of complaint by including therein seven additional causes of action identical in form and substance with the first seven causes set forth in the bill of complaint filed in the companion case of Grace Stein Weigle against the same defendants, civil action No. 938. The motion is opposed upon the ground that the addition of such causes to the present complaint is barred by the statute of limitations, and also by the laches of the complainant.
The bill upon which the case is presently being tried alleges that the Pennroad…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vermillion v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator ConstructorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Hicks v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.