Legal Opinion
People v. Burton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 2006PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
In this case, the People contend that defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized during a search of his person was properly denied without a hearing because he failed to proffer sufficient factual allegations demonstrating that he had standing to challenge the search. The People argue that defendant’s motion was insufficient because he did not admit to possessing the drugs at the time of the search, instead relying on a police officer’s assertion that narcotics were found in defendant’s pocket. We hold that the statements in defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. PonderNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BlanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. DesmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. RuffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.