Legal Opinion
Application of Umbach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 1, 1960No. 38539PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This appeal concerns certain court proceedings instituted in the District Court of Tulsa County, as an aid to the discovery of certain facts or information for ostensible use in an action pending in the District Court in and for the City and County of Denver, and State of Colorado. That action in which Paul H. Umbach, the plaintiff in error here, is being sued by Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, is described in Solliday v. District Court, 135 Colo. 489, 313 P.2d 1000.
Solliday, the defendant in error here, is not a party to the Denver action, but Um-bach wants to inspect, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Webb v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
- Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. ClendinningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matchen v. McGaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Avery v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Giles v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Avery v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Green v. Sixty-Seventh Sales Co.Richmond City Circuit Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.