Edward G. Swartz, Inc. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
What petitioner began in March, 1928, as a contestation before the Board of a $273.-08 deficiency assessment, and a claimed over-assessment of $1,493.61 in its 1926 income tax, was converted by a complete volte face in November, 1929, into a claim that no taxes whatever were due. The petition first filed attacked as inadequate the depletion allowed because based on an estimated cut of 19,142,-787 feet instead of 21,286,585 feet actually cut, an excess of 2,143,798 feet cut in 1926. The amended petition does indeed make the same attack, but only in the alternative. No…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Salvage v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Helvering v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Porter Royalty Pool v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Nordan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.