United States Ex Rel. Diop v. Wayne County Community College District
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This False Claims Act/Section 1983/Michigan Elliotb-Larsen action is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has responded to Defendants’ Motion to which Response Defendants have replied. Having reviewed and considered the parties’ briefs and supporting evidence, and having heard the oral arguments of counsel on January 9, 2003, the Court is now prepared to rule on this matter. This Opinion and Order sets forth the Court’s ruling.
II. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Tanney v. BolesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Polanco v. Omnicell, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Rolph v. Hobart & William Smith CollegesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.