Legal Opinion

State v. Quinones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2006No. 86959PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of the indictment against defendant-appellee, Alex Quinones, for violation of the time provisions contained in R.C. 2963.30, Article 111(a), Ohio’s codification of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“I.A.D.”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} The subject indictment charged defendant with four counts of drug trafficking, three counts of possessing drugs, and one count of possessing criminal tools. Many of the charges included juvenile and firearm specifications.

{¶ 3}…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. MoureyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ReitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ThornOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. McDuffieOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. RichardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. BarrettOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API