Legal Opinion

Dow v. Az Nsac

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 7, 2023No. 1 CA-CV 20-0295Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., Appellants, v. ARIZONA NAVIGABLE STREAM ADJUDICATION COMMISSION, et al., Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 20-0295 1 CA-CV 20-0296 1 CA-CV 20-0297 (Consolidated) FILED 2-7-2023 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Nos. LC2019-000102-001 LC2019-000101-001 LC2019-000100-001 The Honorable Sigmund G. Popko, Judge Pro Tempore AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART COUNSEL Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, Phoenix By Jennifer B. Anderson 1, Daniel J. Adelman Counsel for Appellants Defender of Wildlife, Donald…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API