Legal Opinion

Fowler v. City of Rexburg

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1989No. 17046PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The appellant Don E. Fowler appeals a decision of the Industrial Commission which held that his application for a hearing was barred by the statute of limitations. Fowler, who was employed as a police officer by the City of Rexburg, was covered by Idaho’s Workmen’s Compensation Law under a policy of insurance issued by the State Insurance Fund. Fowler was injured twice during the course of his employment. The first injury occurred in 1972 when Fowler was riding in a police car that hit a snowbank, injuring his right knee. In May of 1973, Fowler, the city, and the State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodvine v. Triangle Dairy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sines v. AppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Facer v. ER Steed Equipment CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bainbridge v. Boise Cascade Plywood MillIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sund v. GambrelIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Tagg v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Oliveros v. Rule Steel Tanks, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API