Legal Opinion

Roper v. Gould

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1913No. Civ. No. 1221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action against defendant as indorser of a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendant appeals.

The note was signed January 1, 1909, due two years after date, negotiable in form, and made by one C. W. McArthur to John P. Benson, who indorsed it as follows: “March 1, 1909. For value received I hereby sell, transfer and assign all my right, title and interest in the within note to Carl P. Gould. John P. Benson”; and delivered it to the defendant, Carl P. Gould, who indorsed thereon the following: “For value received I hereby sell, transfer and assign all my right, title and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. L.A. Nat'l Bank v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Witte v. BrozNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cristina v. MattenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wood v. RoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Rinehart v. LucasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Smith v. HirstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API