Legal Opinion

Rinehart v. Lucas

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1937No. 8381Published

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

This is an action in assumpsit against Charles F. Lucas, who was an indorser, together with M. F. Dred-benner, J. M. Cole, Clyde A. Cole and F. A. Burnett, on a certain promissory note in the principal amount of $1,400.00, dated March 10, 1929, made by Derbrah Silk Company. The plaintiff, E. A. Rinehart, Receiver of Merchants & Mechanics Savings Bank of Grafton, West Virginia, a corporation, prosecutes error to a judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of the defendant.

The note declared on was the final renewal (there having been several renewals) of an original note,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Grandison v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  3. First Nat. Bank v. BachOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. J. W. O'Bannon Co. v. CurranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Overland Auto Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API