Legal Opinion

United States v. Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 15, 2005No. 02 C 6074PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

United States of America ex rel. Cleveland Tyson and the State of Illinois ex rel. Cleveland Tyson (the “plaintiffs”) filed this qui tam suit under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. and Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act (“Illinois Whistleblower Act”). 740 ILCS §§ 175/1 et seq. The FCA establishes civil penalties for any person who files “a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval” by the United States. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1). The provisions of the Illinois Whistleblower…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Finwall v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. Clevenger v. Bolingbrook Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Dot Com Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Cyberbingo Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API