Legal Opinion
Aptus Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 9, 2004No. 01-362CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*810 OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
We have before us Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Judgment, arising from our August 30, 2004 opinion holding that plaintiff Aptus Company failed to prove his case on the merits by a preponderance of the evidence, and entering judgment for defendant. See Aptus Co. v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 638 (2004). In the action underlying this motion, plaintiff sought to prove that his construction contract for the modernization of a hydroelectric power plant owned and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was improperly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Bally Export Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Balicar, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Juliano Internacional S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Seldovia Native Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Roche v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Enron Federal Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Indiana ex rel. Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Jewell (In re Jewell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
- Bulova Technologies Ordnance Systems LLCArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2014
- Highland Al Hujaz Co., Ltd.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2016