Legal Opinion

United States v. Sablan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2008No. 08-10045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Jesus Taitano Sabían appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss a federal indictment on the basis that prosecution of the pending federal charges is barred by the principle of collateral estoppel embodied in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment based upon double jeopardy and collateral estoppel. United States v. Castillo-Basa, 483 F.3d 890, 895 (9th Cir.2007). We review the district court’s factual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Ramon Hernandez-Guardado,defendant-Appellant. United States of America v. Dario Jimenez-FriasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. BhatiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Buenaventura Castillo-BasaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Timothy Wayne Arnett, United States of America v. Timothy Wayne ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ChaSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API