Legal Opinion

United States v. Timothy Wayne Arnett, United States of America v. Timothy Wayne Arnett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 24, 2003No. 00-10170, 00-30189PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On November 25, 2003, only two weeks before these eight-year-old cases were scheduled for oral argument before this en banc court, the United States filed a supplemental brief in which it confessed error on the collateral estoppel issue:

In federal criminal trials, the United States may not use collateral estoppel to establish, as a matter of law, an element of an offense or to conclusively rebut an affirmative defense on which the Government bears the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

In our Case No. 00-10170, the confession of error affects each of the counts charging use of a…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Genaro Smith-BaltiherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. ScarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Luke WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Sandoval-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Marguet-PilladoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API