Legal Opinion

People v. Palmer

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 7, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul G. Feinman, J.

At the April 2, 1998 calendar call, this court decided defendant’s omnibus motion. The court issued an order which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge of attempted tampering with physical evidence and granted his motion to dismiss the charge of disorderly conduct. This constitutes the court’s written decision explaining its reasoning for its prior order.

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FACIAL INSUFFICIENCY

A misdemeanor information is sufficient on its face when it has both an accusatory part designating each and every offense charged and a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. MunafoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. TichenorNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Timberlake v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Burdell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. VargasCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  4. People v. BerdiniCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2007
  5. People v. MercedesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API