Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 2006No. PD-325-05PublishedCited by 595 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

This is an ineffective-assistance of counsel case. We granted discretionary review to decide whether, as a matter of federal constitutional law, appellant’s trial lawyer performed deficiently for eliciting testimony from appellant at the guilt phase of his trial that appellant was already incarcerated on two convictions that were pending on appeal. 1

Appellant was charged in this case with aggravated assault. In exchange for appellant’s guilty plea to this charge, the State initially offered to recommend a ten-year sentence to be served concurrently with a fifteen-year sentence that…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by595 opinions

  1. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Ex Parte Cristela GARCIA, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Fuller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007

590 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API