Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2001No. Civ. A. 00-5082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

WALDMAN, District Judge.

This action arises out of plaintiffs termination from the Philadelphia Police Department (the “Department”). Presently before the court is defendant Drugscan’s Motion to Dismiss Count Seven of Plaintiffs Complaint. The pertinent facts as alleged by plaintiff are as follows.

Plaintiff was a police officer with the Department, assigned to District # 17 (the “District”). During his investigation of suspicious activity while on duty on October 3, 1998, plaintiff entered a room in which several persons were smoking marijuana. He thus exposed himself to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Robb, James v. City of Philadelphia and Mann, Fredric R. And Horowitz, Vladimir and Crawford, Robert W. And Washington, Nathaniel and Doe, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wawrzynek v. Statprobe, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Tricoski v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API