Tricoski v. Laboratory Corp. of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
WALDMAN, District Judge.
This diversity action arises from plaintiffs termination by his employer based on the positive result of a random drug test administered by defendant. Plaintiff alleges that defendant performed the test negligently and that the result was incorrect. Presently before the court is defen dant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties agree that the resolution of the motion turns on the prediction of this court as to whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would recognize a duty of care owed by a drug testing facility to a customer’s employee who is tested.
F…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Willis v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Ferry v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- J.E.J. v. Tri-County Big Bros./Big Sisters, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quisenberry v. Compass Vision, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Wawrzynek v. Statprobe, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005