United States Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Judge:
Before the court is Defendant's motion to dismiss United States Steel Corporation's ("Plaintiff") complaint challenging the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") amended antidumping duty order issued in connection with the final determination in the antidumping duty ("ADD") investigation into oil country tubular goods ("OCTG") from India. See Def.'s Mot. Dismiss, Nov. 29, 2017, ECF No. 15 ("Mot. Dismiss"). Defendant moves to dismiss, contending that the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff's claim is untimely, and contending in the alternative that, even if…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Heartland Hospital v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Bowers Investment Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Novolipetsk Steel Pub. Joint Stock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Byungmin Chae v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Byungmin Chae v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026