Legal Opinion

Jones v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1912No. 8178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Princr, J., Aiken, April, 1911. Action- by Joseph A. Jones against Postal- Telegraph-Cable Company and M. A. Ray. Defendants appeal. cite: Did the Aiken Common Pleas have jurisdiction: 25 S. C. 385; 28 S. C. 313; 22 S. C. 276; 87 & C. 101; 23 Cyc. 683, 697; 87 S. C. 322; 74 S. C. 441; 28 S. C. 315. Was the cfse removable: 84 S. C. 546; 77 S. C. 103; 73 S. C. 17ft; 115 Ga. 1022; 160 U. S- 583; 111 U. S. 637; 107 Fed.

Read the full summary

Before Princr, J., Aiken, April, 1911. Action- by Joseph A. Jones against Postal- Telegraph-Cable Company and M. A. Ray. Defendants appeal. cite: Did the Aiken Common Pleas have jurisdiction: 25 S. C. 385; 28 S. C. 313; 22 S. C. 276; 87 & C. 101; 23 Cyc. 683, 697; 87 S. C. 322; 74 S. C. 441; 28 S. C. 315. Was the cfse removable: 84 S. C. 546; 77 S. C. 103; 73 S. C. 17ft; 115 Ga. 1022; 160 U. S- 583; 111 U. S. 637; 107 Fed. R. 762; 160 U. S. 556; 79 S..C. 204; 347 Fed. 87; 14S Fed., 75; 150 Fed. 805; 174 Fed. R. 709; 204 U. S 176; 200 US. 206; 215 U. S. 308. No cause of action stated against…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion' of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The main questions' involved in this appeal from a judgment for damages for personal injuries, are: (1) Were the defendants entitled to atn order from the Circuit Judge for the removal of the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States)? (2) Was the Circuit Court without jurisdiction) to hear the action) against the defendant, Postal Telegraph Company, because it was a foreign 'corporation' ? ( 8 ) Should a nonsuit have been ordered on the ground that the plaintiff had undertaken the duty of inspecting the defective pole, by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. SheegogSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. McGuire v. . Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Bellamy v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Stogner v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API