Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Anderalli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P. J.
Appeals from 26 decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 1, 1996, October 17, 1996 and October 28, 1996, which ruled, inter alia, that claimants were disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because they voluntarily left their employment without good cause.
Claimants were 26 long-term employees (aged 60 and older) of Nestle Chocolate and Confections Company, a Division of Nestle Food Company (hereinafter the company), and members of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (hereinafter the union), the employees’ collective bargaining agent.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Claim of RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re the Claims of GuarneraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of BologniniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In re Claim HotalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of PullanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002