Furmanite America, Inc. v. Durango Associates, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MacKENZIE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgment that patents held by the defendants are invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed. The matter is now before the Court on the following motions: defendants’ motion to dismiss or to transfer the action, defendants’ motion for a protective order, and plaintiffs' cross-motion for an order compelling discovery.
Defendants moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), (3), and (5) or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Verosol B v. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Eastern Scientific Marketing, Inc. v. Tekna-Seal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. v. Titan Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Capital One Financial Corp. v. Drive Financial Services, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006