Legal Opinion

Ferrell-Michael Abstract & Title Co. v. McCormac

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1915No. 8272PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Eastland County. Action by Mrs. C. B. McCormac and others against the Ferrell-Michael Abstract & Title Company and others, in which R. L. Davenport intervened, and to which George Vaught and another were made parties defendant, From a judgment for plaintiffs and intervener, the named defendant and the im-pleaded defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Mrs. C. B. McCormac, C. A. Gray, and J. W. Ward joined in the institution of this suit in the district court of Eastland county, seeking to recover a judgment upon certain promissory notes severally made to these parties. It was alleged that the note to Mrs. C. B. McCormac, which, principal, interest, and attorney's fees, amounted to $512.60, had been executed by J. M. Ferrell, as principal, and J. R. Stubblefield, as surety, that the note payable to C. A. Gray amounting at the date of the judgment, as found by the court, to $606.68, had been executed by J. M. Ferrell, J. R. Stubblefield, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Clayton v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1879

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Mortgage Corporation v. TraylorTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Cancel Cappa v. MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  4. Garrett v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Ball v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API