Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Katz
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 19, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LÓONET, J.
M. Katz-recovered judgment for debt below against R. L. Garrett and wife, Flora Garrett, with foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on the land involved, against Garrett and wife and Crate Dalton, who was asserting title to half interest in the land. These parties appealed on a cost bond, conditioned as required by article 2265 (2097) (1400) (1400) R. S. 1925, and Dalton, in addition, gave a supersedeas bond with H. O. Headington and A. H. Mc-Whorter, sureties, conditioned as required by article 2270 (2101) (1404) (1404) R. S. 1925. On November 23, 1929, we affirmed the judgment below in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Blair v. SanbornTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Garrett v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Ferrell-Michael Abstract & Title Co. v. McCormacCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In the Matter of Kelly P. Bradley, Debtor. Kelly P. Bradley v. Pacific Southwest Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Lincoln v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- McConnell v. LibecapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Martinez v. Southwest Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Norris v. Thomas (In Re Norris)District Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.