Legal Opinion
United States v. Jeffrey A. Dickstein, Movant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1992No. 90-5236PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma appointed appellant Jeffrey A. Dickstein pro hac vice to represent James Mauldin in a criminal matter involving alleged violations of the laws of the United States. After a mistrial was declared, Dickstein’s permission to appear was revoked due to conduct the district court considered improper and beyond tolerable bounds. Dickstein appeals the order revoking that permission. We hold that we lack jurisdiction to hear his appeal because the order revoking his pro hac vice status is a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gottlieb v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Johnson v. Fremont County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Howard v. Mail-Well Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols, Intervenor. State of Oklahoma, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.