Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank of Manchester v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1955No. 18777PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

1. An oral motion to dismiss is the equivalent of a general demurrer, and the question therein is not whether any particular allegation has been defectively pleaded, but whether the petition in its entirety fails to set out a cause of action. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Hobbs & Livingston, 122 Ga. 20 (1) (49 S. E. 783); Capps v. Edwards, 130 Ga. 146 (1) (60 S. E. 455); Haynes v. Thrift Credit Union, 192 Ga. 229 (2) (14 S. E. 2d 871); Kanes v. Koutras, 203 Ga. 570, 573 (47 S. E. 2d 558).

2. “A general demurrer does not raise questions as to multifariousness, duplicity, or misjoinder…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Hall v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Hobbs & LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corporation v. Masters of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Landers v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Levy v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Rich's, Inc. v. DenmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Bell v. MenziesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API