Farmers & Merchants Bank of Manchester v. Gibson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
1. An oral motion to dismiss is the equivalent of a general demurrer, and the question therein is not whether any particular allegation has been defectively pleaded, but whether the petition in its entirety fails to set out a cause of action. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Hobbs & Livingston, 122 Ga. 20 (1) (49 S. E. 783); Capps v. Edwards, 130 Ga. 146 (1) (60 S. E. 455); Haynes v. Thrift Credit Union, 192 Ga. 229 (2) (14 S. E. 2d 871); Kanes v. Koutras, 203 Ga. 570, 573 (47 S. E. 2d 558).
2. “A general demurrer does not raise questions as to multifariousness, duplicity, or misjoinder…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Hall v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Hobbs & LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sunbeam Corporation v. Masters of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Landers v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Levy v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Rich's, Inc. v. DenmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Bell v. MenziesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.