Legal Opinion
Rich's, Inc. v. Denmon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 20, 1960No. 38201, 38202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
The order overruling the defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s amended petition does not disclose the grounds of said motion, which must therefore be treated as an oral motion to dismiss in the nature of a general demurrer. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Gibson, 211 Ga. 270 (1) (85 S. E. 2d 513). We will accordingly consider it in connection with the overruling of the defendant’s general demurrer to count two.
In support of its general demurrer to count two of the amended petition, the defendant contends that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Manchester v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Stanfield v. Forrest Five to Five Dollar StoresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Rich's, Inc. v. DenmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Chapman v. GilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Virginia Well & Supply Co. v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Setzers Super Stores of Georgia, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Big Apple Super Market of Rome, Inc. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Denmon v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Coile v. Berman-Clyatt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.