Legal Opinion

Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Hobbs & Livingston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1905PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Action for breach of contract. Before Judge Covington. City court of Moultrie. February 27, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The firm of Hobbs & Livingston, in a petition filed in the city court of Moultrie, complained that it had been endamaged by the Minnesota Lumber Company, because of the breach of a contract set forth in the petition. The defendant corporation filed a, demurrer, and also a plea denying all substantial averments of the petition. The case was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,820, together with $180 attorney’s fees. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant, but was overruled by the court. Within thirty days of the trial the defendant sued out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Killen v. ComptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Williams v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
  3. Tommey & Stewart v. FinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Kennon v. PettySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Swindell & Co. v. Bainbridge State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Franklin Savings & Loan Co. v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Palmer v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Prisant v. FeingoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API