Legal Opinion
United States v. Ghali
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 2, 2004No. 3:03-cv-00212PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LYNN, District Judge.
On March 16, 2004, and continuing during trial, at which the Defendant Mohammed Ghali and the Government waived their right to trial by jury, under Fed. R. Cr. P. 23, the Court heard testimony and argument on a Motion to Suppress filed by Defendant Mohammed Ghali. The Court finds that Defendant has standing to challenge the Government’s warrantless searches. However, because the Court finds that the Government would have inevitably discovered the contested evidence and that the addressee of the shipments at issue impliedly consented to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foreman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- United States v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Nathan Ray Foreman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Nathan Ray Foreman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018