Legal Opinion

United States v. Western Processing Co., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 10, 1991No. C89-214M, C83-252M and C89-224MPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART TRANSPORTER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McGOVERN, District Judge.

Transporter Defendants (Third-party defendants, Bayside Waste Hauling and Transfer, Inc.; Crosby & Overton, Inc.; National Transfer, Inc.; Pontius Trucking; and Widing Transportation, Inc.) move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and 56 for dismissal of all claims against them based upon the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 or Washington’s Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), RCW Ch. 70.105D.

The Transporter Defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  2. United States v. Western Processing Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Petersen Sand and Gravel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Tippins Incorporated v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API