Legal Opinion · Concurrence

American & Foreign Ins. v. Colonial Mortgage Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 25, 1991No. 90-7337Published

1ConcurrenceHatchett, Circuit Judge

The umbrella carriers argued before the district court that they owed no duty to Colonial concerning the underlying lawsuit brought against Colonial by the Fords because of the “professional service” liability exclusions contained in the umbrella policies. The district court agreed, and upon Colonial’s appeal to this court, the umbrella *1167carriers again asserted that as a result of the “professional service” exclusions, they owed no duty to indemnify Colonial. The majority disposes of this case based on an argument neither the umbrella carriers, nor the district court considered. Although…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Green v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Cathbake Investment Company, Inc. v. Fisk Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API